14 May 2010 11:27
To The Privacy Commissioner, Ombudsmen and Diane Swan's supervisor/manager:
Regarding the orchestrated litany of lies regarding my complaints about the South End School.
I insist that you copy the numbered, chronological account of events listed in my email to your office, which refers to the conversation with the deputy principal after xxx initiated communication about the matter by telling me about the staff representative's notes, and XXXXXX’s conversation with the staff representative to the BoT, and the principal, and ask XXXXXX to confirm or deny each numbered point -immediately - this matter involves the safety of children and it is completely unacceptable that Diane Swan is deliberately lying, and deliberately delaying and hindering this investigation - she should have sought this information from Powell when she was first asked to do so A YEAR AGO. Swan knows perfecty well that O'Leary is deliberately lying, O'Leary is lying about any meeting with me prior to the writing of the letter, and by concealing the many written complaints from parents about the way he and the Board have treated me, and denying the existence of these complaints and the staff reps notes of the meeting at which it was decided to write the letter - provide this information WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY.
Friends of the Carterton Community Centre
Transparency in New Zealand
Further to my previous email - The Deputy Principal’s email is: "XXXXXXXXX" hurry up and obtain a written response from xxx to my account of events.
Today I received the latest orchestrated litany of lies from Diane Swan who is sucking up tax payers money deliberately corrupting this pathetic excuse for an investigation. Diane Swan, and other corrupt public servants like her, should be sacked without delay for the effect of their corruption on communities like ours.
The evidence speaks for itself, the meeting with O'Leary was a result of the letter I received, not the cause of the letter being sent, O'LEARY IS LYING. WE JUST CAN'T WAIT FOR TWO FACED LIAR O'LEARY TO GET UP ON THE STAND AND SWEAR ON OATH TO THIS PACK OF BLATANTLY OBVIOUS LIES! I INTEND TO CALL A WITNESS WHO WILL ATTEST TO THE DEFAMATORY REMARKS MADE TO HIM BY O'LEARY WHEN THE WITNESS COMPLAINED TO O'LEARY VERBALLY ABOUT THE MATTER IN MAY OR JUNE 2009, WHEN O'LEARY TOLD THE WITNESS THAT "THE POLICE HAVE HARD EVIDENCE AGAINST KATE OF CHILD ABUSE AND ARE GOING TO BE CHARGING HER ANY DAY" - WHICH WAS AN ABSOLUTE AND DELIBERATE SLANDEROUS LIE!
O'LEARY AND DIANE SWAN AND GAVIN KENNEDY ARE LIARS, AND ARE ALL BEING PAID OUT OF THE PUBLIC TROUGH - THIS HAS TO STOP RIGHT NOW, WHICH IS WHY WE ARE PUBLISHING THEIR NASTY, VICIOUS, DESTRUCTIVE LIES FOR ALL TO SEE - THIS IS WHO IS TEACHING YOUR KIDS - THEIVES, BULLIES AND CORRUPT LIARS.
THE REASON FOR IT ALL IS POLITICAL MOTIVATION - OLEARY AND KENNEDY WANT TO GET THEIR SNOUTS IN THE TROUGH TOO, THEY SEE THEMSELVES (LIKE TERE TOREA) AS "COMMUNITY LEADERS". WELL THEY ARE NOT, THEY ARE CORRUPT, THEY ARE LIARS, THEIVES AND BULLIES.
HERE'S THE EVIDENCE OF IT, RECEIVED TODAY:
25 May 2010
Dear Ms Raue
Please find attached the documents as provided to us by South End School.
The School says this consists of a copy of an email sent to Carterton Police forming part of the evidence in Mr O'Leary's complaint against you; a copy of one letter from parents regarding you; and a copy of the Board of Trustees reply to the [PARENTS WHO WROTE A LETTER OF COMPLAINT TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES]. The School says that there is only one letter it has received from parents.
I have also included a copy of your email to Mr O'Leary sent on 3 September 2009 in which you said (at paragraph 3 on the first page) that you had met with Mr O'Leary.
Hard copies of the attachments will be posted to the address you provided (XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX).
The School has advised me that it does not hold any further records or information about you so there does not appear to be anything further for this Office to investigate. You requested copies of your personal information from the School and it has now provided that information. As noted previously, under the Privacy Act you are not entitled to information that does not identify you.
In the circumstances, I intend recommending that your complaint file be closed. However, before we make a final decision in this regard, if you have any further information that you think it would be helpful for us to consider then you are welcome to provide that.
Diane Swan, Team Leader, Investigations, Privacy Commission.
So, what we've got here is hard evidence of deliberate corruption. O'Leary and Swan are alleging that I met with O'Leary before the Board of Trustees wrote the letter sacking me because of the false allegation that I had been charged with an offence involving a child. "The School has also told me that it did not collect any information about you from the Police. I understand you had a meeting with Mr O'Leary at which you told him about being charged by the Police, and which is also referred to in the Board of Trustees letter. As you disclosed this information to the School, and it did not collect any further information gathered from Police, there is no privacy issue for us to investigate."